Comments on: It’s Finally Here http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/ News, thoughts, and announcements from Metaversatility, Inc. Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:14:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Cuba virtual http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-9329 Wed, 14 May 2008 23:12:54 +0000 http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-9329 [...] [...] […] […]

]]> by: The Click Heard Round the World http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-9196 Tue, 13 May 2008 02:57:55 +0000 http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-9196 <strong>Virtual Cuba versus Real World Cuba</strong> Earlier this month, the metaverse development company Metaversatility launched a new showcase sim EmVee Cuba in Second Life (click here to teleport.) It's a lovely, picturesque island, pushing the envelope on what is possible in SL, with each prim, te... Virtual Cuba versus Real World Cuba

Earlier this month, the metaverse development company Metaversatility launched a new showcase sim EmVee Cuba in Second Life (click here to teleport.) It’s a lovely, picturesque island, pushing the envelope on what is possible in SL, with each prim, te…

]]> by: Second Sweden » Blog Archive » Fototävling med fina priser http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8893 Tue, 06 May 2008 07:10:07 +0000 http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8893 [...] Läs mer om tävlingen, som pågår till och med den 16 maj, här. [...] […] Läs mer om tävlingen, som pågår till och med den 16 maj, här. […]

]]> by: Lem Skall http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8805 Sat, 03 May 2008 22:05:53 +0000 http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8805 Yes, Adri, thanks. That answers my question. :) Yes, Adri, thanks. That answers my question. :)

]]> by: Adri http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8802 Sat, 03 May 2008 21:50:40 +0000 http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8802 Lem, we won't reject any image due to size, but we'd like to ensure the RL prints sent to winners are satisfying, and for that reason the 1500x1200px is 'recommended.' For your 16800x1028 shot, I believe that the 8"xD print option would work because it will retain your own aspect ratio. Mostly, we would like the winners to be happy with their prizes. :) If we end up awarding the L$10,000 prize to a lower resolution pic, we may ask that photographer to choose a different, higher-res picture for printing or simply eliminate that part of the prize package. The creators/photographers retain full rights to all of their own work, so we won't be using these in print materials of our own, but we would like people to be happy with their prints! Does that answer your question? Lem, we won’t reject any image due to size, but we’d like to ensure the RL prints sent to winners are satisfying, and for that reason the 1500×1200px is ‘recommended.’ For your 16800×1028 shot, I believe that the 8″xD print option would work because it will retain your own aspect ratio.

Mostly, we would like the winners to be happy with their prizes. :) If we end up awarding the L$10,000 prize to a lower resolution pic, we may ask that photographer to choose a different, higher-res picture for printing or simply eliminate that part of the prize package.

The creators/photographers retain full rights to all of their own work, so we won’t be using these in print materials of our own, but we would like people to be happy with their prints!

Does that answer your question?

]]> by: Lem Skall http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8801 Sat, 03 May 2008 21:37:20 +0000 http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8801 Adri, thanks, but if that is a rule of your contest, are you going to reject pictures under a certain resolution? What if my pictures are 1680x1028 (one side is under 1200)? Please clarify. Adri, thanks, but if that is a rule of your contest, are you going to reject pictures under a certain resolution? What if my pictures are 1680×1028 (one side is under 1200)? Please clarify.

]]> by: Adri http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8800 Sat, 03 May 2008 21:04:29 +0000 http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8800 Hi Lem, thanks for asking. Flickr recommends a minimum of 1500x1200 pixels for an 8x10" (or 8xD, which will keep the aspect ratio of the digital image) prints. Hi Lem, thanks for asking. Flickr recommends a minimum of 1500×1200 pixels for an 8×10″ (or 8xD, which will keep the aspect ratio of the digital image) prints.

]]> by: Peter http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8798 Sat, 03 May 2008 20:48:09 +0000 http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8798 You can choose in Second Life to take 'High Resolution Snapshots", basically just so they'll look better in print. You can choose in Second Life to take ‘High Resolution Snapshots”, basically just so they’ll look better in print.

]]> by: Lem Skall http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8792 Sat, 03 May 2008 18:39:46 +0000 http://metaversatility.com/wordpress/2008/05/01/its-finally-here/#comment-8792 What does "high-res" mean? Any specific limits, numbers? What does “high-res” mean? Any specific limits, numbers?

]]>